I will criticize President Obama on this level; it's a good thing I'm not president because I would prosecute every person that was involved in that torture. I would prosecute the people that did it. I would prosecute the people that ordered it. Because torture is against the law.
"I Can't Wait to Do a Tracheotomy" and other love songs available just because you damn well want them.
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Former Navy SEAL Jesse Ventura on Torture
Friday, May 01, 2009
"No exceptional circumstances whatsoever..."
No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat or war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture... Each State Party shall ensure that all acts of torture are offences under its criminal law.
The United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, signed by, and championed by, President Ronald Reagan. (h/t)
Monday, April 27, 2009
Saturday, April 25, 2009
Torture Memo Author "Regrets" Writing Memo
I think this is very big news:
And other sources, not anonymous:
This is no accident. Bybee's friends have been sent to get this message out, and it is very bad for Bush officials, possibly including Bybee. He "regrets" writing the memo? I thought everything was perfect and perfectly legal and hunkey-dory with all this. Bybee's telegraphing to the press that it's not. How is that not huge news?
To put this another way: Say Bush and Cheney and the lot of them are accused of murder. They and their supporters keep going on TV and defending them, or distorting the issue, or whatever. Their lawyer, who helped them commit the crime, just said "they're guilty."
This is enormous news.

"I've heard him express regret at the contents of the memo," said a fellow legal scholar and longtime friend, who spoke on the condition of anonymity while offering remarks that might appear as "piling on." "I've heard him express regret that the memo was misused. I've heard him express regret at the lack of context -- of the enormous pressure and the enormous time pressure that he was under. And anyone would have regrets simply because of the notoriety."
And other sources, not anonymous:
Tuan Samahon, a former clerk who recalled Bybee's remarks at the reunion dinner, said in an e-mail that the judge defended the legal reasoning behind the memos but not the policy decision. Bybee was disappointed by what was done to prisoners, saying that "the spirit of liberty has left the republic," Samahon said.
"Jay would be the sort of lawyer who would say, 'Look, I'll give you the legal advice, but it's up to someone else to make the policy decision whether you implement it,' " said Randall Guynn, who roomed with Bybee at Brigham Young University and remains close.
This is no accident. Bybee's friends have been sent to get this message out, and it is very bad for Bush officials, possibly including Bybee. He "regrets" writing the memo? I thought everything was perfect and perfectly legal and hunkey-dory with all this. Bybee's telegraphing to the press that it's not. How is that not huge news?
To put this another way: Say Bush and Cheney and the lot of them are accused of murder. They and their supporters keep going on TV and defending them, or distorting the issue, or whatever. Their lawyer, who helped them commit the crime, just said "they're guilty."
This is enormous news.
Thursday, April 16, 2009
1,500 Farmers Commit Mass Suicide
No words.
*Not much out about this story yet. Let's hope there are big mistakes in it.

*Not much out about this story yet. Let's hope there are big mistakes in it.
More than 1,500 farmers in central India have reportedly committed mass suicide in the wake of crop failure and increasing debt.
The suicides took place in the agricultural state of Chattisgarh, where people mainly depend on seasonal crops, Earth Magazine reported.
Local residents told the magazine that many of the farmers felt that death was the only option in the face of their insurmountable debt.
[...]
"Farmers' suicides are increasing due to a vicious circle created by money lenders. They lure farmers to take money but when the crops fail, they are left with no option other than death," Prakash said.
At least 10,000 debt-ridden farmers in different parts of the country have committed suicide over the last decade.
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Right-Wing Nutcases Upset That Cops Hate Right-Wing Nutcases [updts]
This is just too funny. The Department of Homeland Security (if I could tell you how much I hate that name) has released a report stating that right-wing extremism is rising in recent months. Big surprise, huh?
Malkin and other likeminded nutcases are Free King Out. It really is too funny. Look at the Malkin:
Um, Malkin, the report is about violent extremists. Are you identifying with violent extremists? Sure seems like it.
And this really takes the cake. Read this:
You know what that is in Malkin and right-wing nutcase land? That's anti-military. Because saying that "right wing extremists will" do yada yada is anti-yada yada. Perfectly logical.
Hey, assholes: The cop killer in Pittsburgh fed off the kind of hate you've been preaching on a daily basis for years. So did the guy trying to build a dirty bomb in Vermont. So did the church shooter in Tennessee. Hell, the worst domestic terrorist in the country's history, Timothy McVeigh, fed on the same stuff. Get used to it being noticed and scrutinized under an administration that doesn't actually pander to that kind of thing.
Update: Even Charles Johnson at Little Green Footballs calls the wingers crazy on this one. And notes that the assessment began more than a year ago, so it's hardly an Obama administration effort.
And oh, look: a DHS report on left-wing extremism. Go figure.
Update II: The national commander of the Veterans of Foreign Wars defends the report:
Note: This post was up before this very good one.

Malkin and other likeminded nutcases are Free King Out. It really is too funny. Look at the Malkin:
By contrast, the piece of crap report issued on April 7 is a sweeping indictment of conservatives.
Um, Malkin, the report is about violent extremists. Are you identifying with violent extremists? Sure seems like it.
And this really takes the cake. Read this:
DHS/I&A assesses that rightwing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to exploit their skills and knowledge derived from military training and combat.
You know what that is in Malkin and right-wing nutcase land? That's anti-military. Because saying that "right wing extremists will" do yada yada is anti-yada yada. Perfectly logical.
Hey, assholes: The cop killer in Pittsburgh fed off the kind of hate you've been preaching on a daily basis for years. So did the guy trying to build a dirty bomb in Vermont. So did the church shooter in Tennessee. Hell, the worst domestic terrorist in the country's history, Timothy McVeigh, fed on the same stuff. Get used to it being noticed and scrutinized under an administration that doesn't actually pander to that kind of thing.
Update: Even Charles Johnson at Little Green Footballs calls the wingers crazy on this one. And notes that the assessment began more than a year ago, so it's hardly an Obama administration effort.
And oh, look: a DHS report on left-wing extremism. Go figure.
Update II: The national commander of the Veterans of Foreign Wars defends the report:
Glen M. Gardner Jr., national commander of the Veterans of Foreign Wars, disputed claims that Homeland Security analysts were describing veterans as terror threats.
"The report should have been worded differently, but it made no blanket accusation that every soldier was capable of being a traitor like Benedict Arnold, or every veteran could be a lone wolf, homegrown terrorist like Timothy McVeigh," said Gardner, a Marine veteran from Round Rock, Texas. " It was just an assessment about possibilities that could take place."
Note: This post was up before this very good one.
Thursday, April 02, 2009
Wednesday, April 01, 2009
Bottomfeeders Blogging
If you've got a need for a new song for your iPod or similar device, please consider a song from my CD, Bottomfeeders, at iTunes, or any of the several music sites under "Vital Links" to the right. (CDBaby is a nice little company here in Oregon.)
If you have a minute, go give it a listen, see if you find a song that suits you.
* This has been a blog advertising moment. Thanks for the time. *
If you have a minute, go give it a listen, see if you find a song that suits you.
* This has been a blog advertising moment. Thanks for the time. *
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Seve Ballesteros Update
Update: It's May 8, 2011, in Australia, and I've just learned that Seve has died. My final post on him here.Spanish golfing great Seve Ballesteros, battling brain cancer, has spoken publicly for the first time since being diagnosed in October, 2008. (Several updates at link, last from May, 2011.)
(And I just found that great photo - click to enlarge - on a PDF at his Web site.)
Hit the Seve tag in "labels" just below this post for much more info.
R. Crumb to Publish Bible Satire
Specifically the Book of Genesis:
Scheduled to be out this autumn.

The acclaimed satirist revealed on his personal website that he had finished the project, which is out this autumn, and which his UK publisher is predicting will "provoke the religious right". Four years in the making, Crumb worked from the King James Bible and Robert Alter's translation to reinterpret the Book of Genesis, from the Creation via Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden to Noah boarding his ark.
Scheduled to be out this autumn.
41% unemployment
Welcome to Mendota, California:

Many people in Mendota are turning to alcohol to battle depression, said Amador, the council member. And some single-family homes are occupied by two or three families, in what Amador described as "basically labor camps."
Friday, March 27, 2009
Gene Burnett and DeLonde Bell
There is No Push For a "Global Currency"
Michelle Bachman is so embarrassingly stupid that if I lived in Minnesota I'd lie and say I was from Wisconsin.
Here's a lesson for the stupidest person in Congress:
The remarks you refer to when you talk about a "global currency" are about the international reserve currency. It has nothing - absolutely nothing - to do with the existence or non-existence of the dollar.
Matthew Yglesias:
A good rule to live by: if Michelle Bachman and Glenn Beck are talking, they're either lying or wrong, or a lot of both.

Here's a lesson for the stupidest person in Congress:
The remarks you refer to when you talk about a "global currency" are about the international reserve currency. It has nothing - absolutely nothing - to do with the existence or non-existence of the dollar.
Matthew Yglesias:
This falsehoods here are coming so fast and loose that it’s hard to know where to start here. But to get to the main point, most countries hold “reserves” of various kinds—foreign currency and gold. Most countries, right now, primarily hold dollars. Euros are also popular, and Yen and British Pounds somewhat less so. The United States of America does not, obviously, hold any dollars in our reserves. We actually have quite a lot of gold. And different countries vary their practices in this regard. But most countries mostly hold their reserves in dollars. So the dollar is, in effect, the “global reserve currency.” The IMF also issues something called Special Drawing Rights that countries can use as a reserve asset. SDRs work as a kind of meta-currency, with their value based on a basket of major world currencies. A Chinese official suggested that it might be good for the world to tilt away from such a heavy reliance on dollars as the reserve currency of choice, since this leaves countries exposed to policy decisions in the United States, and toward something more SDR-like that would be balanced between dollars and euros and yen and pounds and so forth.
A good rule to live by: if Michelle Bachman and Glenn Beck are talking, they're either lying or wrong, or a lot of both.
Thursday, March 26, 2009
The War On Kids Continues
How weird is it that we regularly hear stories about "anti-teen" technology? The latest:
When your language regularly uses the word "teen" as an actual pejorative, maybe the focus should be on the adults.

LONDON (AFP) – A British town is using garish pink lighting that shows up acne to deter teenagers from loitering, in the latest example of using simple technology to break up loutish gatherings.
Residents of Mansfield in central England have installed fluorescent pink lights normally used by dermatologists to show up pimples and acne blemishes.
That aside, it is also thought that surly teenage males might find it "uncool" to hang around in a bright pink underpass.
When your language regularly uses the word "teen" as an actual pejorative, maybe the focus should be on the adults.
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Disney-Produced WWII Anti-Tank-Rifle Training Video
From World War Two. It's partially animated. The Hitler is hilarious, in a Hitler sort of way.
Parts 2 and 3 are here.

Parts 2 and 3 are here.
Bobby Jindal Thinks Civil Disobedience is Treason
At least that's what it sounds like.
Jindal was on CNN last night just before Obama's press conference. Why the Republicans would do that after his debacle after the State of the Union address is beyond me. Look at just this tiny bit of what Jindal had to say last night:
The "I want the president to fail" stuff aside (okay, not completely aside - what would Obama failing look like? Really - what would it look like?) what the hell does he mean with "treason, civil disobedience"? What the hell does that mean? Is civil disobedience a form of treason to this jackass?
Crikey, these people are mutants. And he threw in a joke about torture. Wonderful.

Jindal was on CNN last night just before Obama's press conference. Why the Republicans would do that after his debacle after the State of the Union address is beyond me. Look at just this tiny bit of what Jindal had to say last night:
Jindal described the premise of the question -- "Do you want the president to fail?" -- as the "latest gotcha game" being perpetrated by Democrats against Republicans.
"Make no mistake: Anything other than an immediate and compliant, 'Why no sir, I don't want the president to fail,' is treated as some sort of act of treason, civil disobedience or political obstructionism,"...
The "I want the president to fail" stuff aside (okay, not completely aside - what would Obama failing look like? Really - what would it look like?) what the hell does he mean with "treason, civil disobedience"? What the hell does that mean? Is civil disobedience a form of treason to this jackass?
Crikey, these people are mutants. And he threw in a joke about torture. Wonderful.
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Dolphins Blow Ring-Shaped Bubbles
And then they play with them. Just too cool. Look at the moment at about 1:20 in.
And since this has been on youTube several times over the last couple years, it almost seems like this is a disguised advertisement for the aquarium that posted the video. But whatever.

And since this has been on youTube several times over the last couple years, it almost seems like this is a disguised advertisement for the aquarium that posted the video. But whatever.
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Understanding the Employee Free Choice Act
Here's a more in depth explanation, but I wanted to explain this simply to myself, and anyone else who cares.
Scenario:
• You work in a restaurant where the employer beats you with tire irons and pays you five nickels-an-hour for your 107 hours of work every week.
• You and your fellow employees discuss unionization, so you can collectively bargain with the employer about the tire iron beatings, and other stuff.
• 98% of you want to unionize. You fill out forms ("cards") authorizing unionization.
• You go to the employer with the cards. He may, upon presentation of the cards, recognize you as a union. That's the law. That's "card check."
• He can also say F*ck you and fire your asses. That's against the law, but your employer doesn't care, and if questioned will say you were crappy employees. Who's gonna win?
• The employer can also say, "Get a petition with at least 30% of your names on it, give it to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) [a government agency], and they'll supervise a secret ballot of all the employees."
• That normally takes about six weeks.
• In the meantime he can fire a bunch of you so you can't form a union.
• Card check bypasses the *government-run* NLRB election, just to note. It's "small governmenty."
• Card check is how it worked when the NLRB was formed in the New Deal years. It made sense. It was a simple way for employees to get out from under the boot of asshole employers, who existed (and still exist) in great numbers.
• The Employee Free Choice Act makes employers recognize card check. They can't force an election. It takes some power out of employers' hands, and puts it in employees' hands. No more tire iron beatings. And better, more fair pay.
• Here's the most important part: After doing the card check thing, employees can still choose to hold a secret ballot. The EFCA does not "strip away" the secret ballot, as is being yelled by Republicans, it "strips away" the power of employers to force an election, a delaying tactic, even in cases like yours, when 98% of employees plainly want to unionize.
• That's the Employee Free Choice Act, explained.

Scenario:
• You work in a restaurant where the employer beats you with tire irons and pays you five nickels-an-hour for your 107 hours of work every week.
• You and your fellow employees discuss unionization, so you can collectively bargain with the employer about the tire iron beatings, and other stuff.
• 98% of you want to unionize. You fill out forms ("cards") authorizing unionization.
• You go to the employer with the cards. He may, upon presentation of the cards, recognize you as a union. That's the law. That's "card check."
• He can also say F*ck you and fire your asses. That's against the law, but your employer doesn't care, and if questioned will say you were crappy employees. Who's gonna win?
• The employer can also say, "Get a petition with at least 30% of your names on it, give it to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) [a government agency], and they'll supervise a secret ballot of all the employees."
• That normally takes about six weeks.
• In the meantime he can fire a bunch of you so you can't form a union.
• Card check bypasses the *government-run* NLRB election, just to note. It's "small governmenty."
• Card check is how it worked when the NLRB was formed in the New Deal years. It made sense. It was a simple way for employees to get out from under the boot of asshole employers, who existed (and still exist) in great numbers.
• The Employee Free Choice Act makes employers recognize card check. They can't force an election. It takes some power out of employers' hands, and puts it in employees' hands. No more tire iron beatings. And better, more fair pay.
• Here's the most important part: After doing the card check thing, employees can still choose to hold a secret ballot. The EFCA does not "strip away" the secret ballot, as is being yelled by Republicans, it "strips away" the power of employers to force an election, a delaying tactic, even in cases like yours, when 98% of employees plainly want to unionize.
• That's the Employee Free Choice Act, explained.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)