You've got to watch it. The message: if we close Gitmo ... they'll BRING THE TERRORISTS HERE!!!! To Leavenworth, and similar hyper-security prisons.
Do these people think that the average American walks around afraid of people in Leavenworth?
Friday, February 06, 2009
And Now a Word For Gitmo
Someone group of pant-wetting macho whiner wannabes - called "Move America Forward" (toward any convenient cliff, apparently) - has made an ad for Gitmo. An ad...for Gitmo.
You've got to watch it. The message: if we close Gitmo ... they'll BRING THE TERRORISTS HERE!!!! To Leavenworth, and similar hyper-security prisons.
Do these people think that the average American walks around afraid of people in Leavenworth?
You've got to watch it. The message: if we close Gitmo ... they'll BRING THE TERRORISTS HERE!!!! To Leavenworth, and similar hyper-security prisons.
Do these people think that the average American walks around afraid of people in Leavenworth?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
You are retarded and completely miss the point.
Terrorists in America, it doesnt matter where, are subject to the same criminal justice sytem that everyone else is - one that is entirely too forgiving and frankly they don't deserve it.
Also, for your information Fort Leavenworth, NAVCONBRIG and Pendleton are NOT what you call "hyper-security" prisons. Pendleton isn't even a prison.
Ft. Leavenworth is supposed to be a disciplinary barracks and Charleson is a brig -- both of those are intended for military
the scum at gitmo doesn't even deserve to be in the same place and equal to them -- at least they signed up to serve their country
The final obvious fallacy in your logic you save for the very end.
Because no one is afraid of the people at fort leavenworth DOES NOT MEAN that if you bring dangerous terrorists who hate America and want to destroy it and then put those people at Ft. Leavenworth -- THAT DOES NOT mitigate the desire of those bastards to kill each and every one of us.
It simply brings them one step closer to our doorstep
Since Obama’s earnest drive to convince the nation to weaken its economic strength through redistribution as well as weaken its national defense, have confirmed the very threats to our Republic’s survival that the Constitution was designed to avert, it no longer is sustainable for the United States Supreme Court and Military Joint Chiefs to refrain from exercising WHAT IS THEIR ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY TO DEFEND THE NATION FROM UNLAWFUL USURPATION. The questions of Obama’s Kenyan birth and his father’s Kenyan/British citizenship (admitted on his own website) have been conflated by his sustained unwillingnes to supply his long form birth certificate now under seal, and compounded by his internet posting of a discredited “after-the-fact” short form ‘certificate’. In the absence of these issues being acknowledged and addessed, IT IS MANIFEST THAT OBAMA REMAINS INELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. Being a 14th Amendment “citizen” is not sufficient. A “President” MUST BE an Article 2 “natural born citizen” AS DEFINED BY THE FRAMERS’ INTENT.
Celia. You shouldn't call people "retards." You especially.
Ted. You lost. Get over it.
LT,
You seem to have attracted a couple, eh? One's slow and the other is a sore loser.
I suppose it could be worse. One could be a slow loser the other one just sore.
Why or this post I just don't know.
Post a Comment